ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 2948
Jan 14 10 3:03 PM
I've been NAUGHTY!And all I got was a...Stupid Stinking Title!
Posts: 2164
Jan 14 10 4:14 PM
Keeper of the Trades' Scrolls
Posts: 14383
Jan 15 10 6:45 AM
Lost Cleric of Norrath Twice a day even a broken clock is right.
Derekeen wrote: Welcome to the USSA!
Jan 15 10 6:46 AM
Posts: 12794
Jan 15 10 8:30 AM
Don't Blame Me,I voted for Kodos.
Aunor wrote: Funny how you never minded it Bush had Exxon over to the white house.
Posts: 9286
Jan 15 10 10:36 AM
The liberals stopped replying so I win.Next topic please.
XENOJONES wrote: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34859430/ns/politics-health_care_reform The White House reached a tentative agreement with union leaders early Thursday to tax high-cost insurance plans Since when does the White House have to negotiate with unions in order to raise taxes?
The White House reached a tentative agreement with union leaders early Thursday to tax high-cost insurance plans
Jan 15 10 12:06 PM
Jan 15 10 12:16 PM
XENOJONES wrote: At some point both parties need to tell the tail to stop wagging. Dems can tell the unions to fuck off because unions are not going to support a Republican and the Republicans need to tell the religious right to fuck off because they will not support a democrat.
Jan 15 10 12:26 PM
Posts: 2319
Jan 15 10 2:33 PM
XENOJONES wrote: Aunor wrote: Funny how you never minded it Bush had Exxon over to the white house. How much profit did Exxon make while Bush was in office? How much did Exxon pay in taxes while Bush was in office? Find out and then compare them to what the average citizen pays in taxes percentage-wise and then get back to me on how much Exxon controlled the White House.
Jan 15 10 3:06 PM
DesdichadaFV wrote: It always amazes me how some can not put things together. If the Big Oil (under any administration) had much of a hold on the White House, there would be no US support for Israel. They are much more comfortable with dealing with oil nations' dictators then have US foreign policy be so bent on pro-Israel stand. US action in Iraq was completely against their interests.
It always amazes me how some can not put things together. If the Big Oil (under any administration) had much of a hold on the White House, there would be no US support for Israel. They are much more comfortable with dealing with oil nations' dictators then have US foreign policy be so bent on pro-Israel stand. US action in Iraq was completely against their interests.
Jan 16 10 6:02 AM
Jan 16 10 6:08 AM
DesdichadaFV wrote: XENOJONES wrote: Aunor wrote: Funny how you never minded it Bush had Exxon over to the white house. How much profit did Exxon make while Bush was in office? How much did Exxon pay in taxes while Bush was in office? Find out and then compare them to what the average citizen pays in taxes percentage-wise and then get back to me on how much Exxon controlled the White House. It always amazes me how some can not put things together. If the Big Oil (under any administration) had much of a hold on the White House, there would be no US support for Israel. They are much more comfortable with dealing with oil nations' dictators then have US foreign policy be so bent on pro-Israel stand. US action in Iraq was completely against their interests.
Jan 17 10 1:23 AM
Jan 17 10 7:17 AM
Jan 17 10 11:36 AM
Aunor wrote: Its pointless, you are just anti union.
Jan 17 10 1:30 PM
Jan 17 10 6:08 PM
Aunor wrote: Every company has the unions it deserves.
Jan 17 10 6:17 PM
Jan 18 10 1:00 AM
Aunor wrote: Your take is unions shouldn't meet with the President. You are the one that sounds hollow and biased. I mean come on... can't find any posts of you ranting about this: "In what aides described as a political thank-you for an endorsement, President-elect George Bush and his incoming White House chief of staff met privately yesterday with top officials of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, including six scheduled to go on trial next month in a Justice Department civil suit charging them with racketeering...."
Share This